Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:08:49 -0800 From: Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, Andrew Reilly <areilly@bigpond.net.au>, "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind Message-ID: <3AC0D731.B3D15DA3@DougBarton.net> References: <20010326175419.X40349@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20010321104438.A94096@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010326090306.D40349@wantadilla.lemis.com> <3ABEF43A.D4DA1929@DougBarton.net> <20010326172414.V40349@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20010326181905.B75840@gurney.reilly.home> <200103270740.f2R7eJ942673@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <20010326175419.X40349@wantadilla.lemis.com> Greg Lehey writes:
> : > Play the ball, not the man.
> :
> : I don't have an objection to the change, I was just asking. And
> : "because System V does it this way" has never been a good answer for
> : us. And no, I'm not picking on Doug, just making a point.
>
> I see no reason why the name can't remain portmap.
My previous comment was mostly an attempt at humor, in case anyone missed
that. :) I have no problem with keeping the name the same as it is in
netbsd to make code sharing easier. If this were something that users
interacted with directly I'd fight harder, but as it is portmap is
basically always started from rc*. We'll have another round of pain from
people who fail to properly update /etc, but we have enough land mines
there already to make this point moot.
Doug
--
Perhaps the greatest damage the American system of education has done
to its children is to teach them that their opinions are relevant
simply because they are their opinions.
Do YOU Yahoo!?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3AC0D731.B3D15DA3>