Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 19:21:44 -0700 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: PATCH: Forcible delaying of UFS (soft)updates Message-ID: <3EA0B2B8.4000600@tenebras.com> In-Reply-To: <3EA0A647.BEC5931A@mindspring.com> References: <3E976EBD.C3E66EF8@tel.fer.hr> <200304182243.05739.zec@tel.fer.hr> <3EA06C07.A34F1C31@mindspring.com> <200304182348.58356.zec@tel.fer.hr> <3EA0A647.BEC5931A@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert wrote: > Obviously I am not explaining myself correctly. I guess the next > step would be to offer my own patch set for doing what you are > trying to do. Before I do that, let me try one more time. Forgive me, but let me cut through this Gordian Knot and just say: the proposal is for the introduction of a feature of questionable value, with consequences that have not been adequately considered. It should never be committed.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EA0B2B8.4000600>