Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 16:23:58 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Tatsumi Hosokawa <hosokawa@itc.keio.ac.jp> Cc: mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Better solution of "devclass_alloc_unit: ed1 already exists" problem? Message-ID: <200001152323.QAA01357@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 16 Jan 2000 07:32:08 %2B0900." <861z7jt193.wl@ringo.FromTo.Cc> References: <861z7jt193.wl@ringo.FromTo.Cc> <867lhbt4rg.wl@ringo.FromTo.Cc> <864scft38i.wl@ringo.FromTo.Cc> <863drzt2xe.wl@ringo.FromTo.Cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <861z7jt193.wl@ringo.FromTo.Cc> Tatsumi Hosokawa writes: : I wrote a patch for "devclass_alloc_unit: ed1 already exists" problem. : I only add a small patch to GENERIC to the hack I wrote in the last : mail, but I think it would be better than the patch for : pccard.conf.sample alone. : : Comments? Ufff. That's ugly, but less ugly than some of the alternatives. I don't think that you need ed1/sio4 in the kernel config file. That will happen all by itself since the number of devices is no longer known at compile time. A better solution might be to have the system create the device and return it to pccardd so that it could pass it as an argument to the insert command, but even that has its problems. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001152323.QAA01357>