Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:33:52 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Denis Peplin <den@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: TCP Wrappers section (handbook/security): services is not daemons Message-ID: <20041015103352.1f08e8c8@localhost> In-Reply-To: <416FD943.2050302@FreeBSD.org> References: <416E4DFD.3040203@FreeBSD.org> <20041014102459.GD799@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20041014092213.22d6914d@localhost> <416E8491.8080500@FreeBSD.org> <20041014101233.399d4b40@localhost> <416E8CD3.9070700@FreeBSD.org> <416F9BE5.5020403@FreeBSD.org> <20041015100829.GG1099@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <416FA795.3020800@FreeBSD.org> <20041015092936.52851473@localhost> <416FD943.2050302@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 18:05:55 +0400 Denis Peplin <den@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Hello! > > Tom Rhodes wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 14:33:57 +0400 > > Denis Peplin <den@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > >>Hello! > >> > >>Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >> > >>>On 2004-10-15 13:44, Denis Peplin <den@freebsd.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>Hello! > >>>> > >>>>I have patch for this issue (attached), and keramida help > >>>>me to fix it English form. > >>>> > >>>>log: > >>>>Obtain some information from inetd(8) to fix "inetd" > >>>>description in network-servers chapter. > >>>>Add note about "daemon" term to "tcpwrappers" section > >>>>of security chapter. > >>> > >>> > >>>Ah, now that I see the log message... > >>> > >>>These two are really separate, a bit unrelated changes. If you do > >>>commit the change to security/chapter.sgml do it in a second commit. > >>>This way the CVS log entry of each file contains text that is relevant > >>>to that file and not to some other, random stuff. > >> > >>ok, not a problem :) > > > > > > I just don't like to see a ton of note this and note that > > throughout the handbook. It looks rather ugly and is overused > > in many cases as a replacement for rewriting the section to > > conform to all releases. It's so much easier, IMO, to tag the > > handbook; however, that is not a fight I can win here. > > > I hope, this is not fight with me :) > [attempt to joke above] Heh, I have no reason to fight with you. Have no fear. :) > > Yes, it so hard to fix all things, that really ugly. > As translator, I work with huge amount of text from handbook, and some > parts of it near to "too bad to translate". > But it is at least better than nothing :) Another translator told me the same thing a good while ago, in all honesty I wish translators would tell me what sections they are having problems with. :) > > And, of course, you can commit another solution for issues, > discussed in this topic, w/o asking me. Heh, as if I needed anyone's permission to commit something. :P [that was a joke but I chose to point it out because you are not a native speaker] -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041015103352.1f08e8c8>