Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 16:02:53 +0800 From: Ernie Luzar <luzar722@gmail.com> To: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> Cc: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@freebsd.org>, "ports@FreeBSD.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Removing documentation Message-ID: <56B99D2D.4030402@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1vcdXfs_Lwbcfcd8JUgK_LNjXwZzKNzoz2-DBjeM%2BBXcA@mail.gmail.com> References: <bug-206922-273-PXN38rlW5F@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <bug-206922-273-YnY5vf8jP1@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <bug-206922-273-kkQfWZPv1w@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <20160207000304.GA71035@eureka.lemis.com> <CAN6yY1vcdXfs_Lwbcfcd8JUgK_LNjXwZzKNzoz2-DBjeM%2BBXcA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@freebsd.org> > wrote: > >> I'm bringing this to the attention of the ports community to try to >> come up with a consensus about how to handle existing documentation >> for ageing packages, in this case portmaster. >> >> This bug report suggests removing the documentation for portmaster >> because it is out of date and no longer maintained. >> 3 or 4 years ago the handbook never recommended any port. Only utility tools contained in the base release were allowed to be documented in the handbook. This standard should be enforced again. The tool portmaster and ezjail should be removed from the handbook or be included as part of the base system release.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56B99D2D.4030402>