Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 01:01:12 +0100 From: Mario Marietto <marietto2008@gmail.com> To: Mark Peek <mp@freebsd.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Corvin_K=C3=B6hne?= <c.koehne@beckhoff.com>, FreeBSD virtualization <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Failed to emulate instruction sequence [ 41f646040874064c017d88eb144c89 ] at 0xbea5fcf9 Message-ID: <CA%2B1FSigejmmCyt5QfSxT2SkYEf0iLj6k6boT9inViasiQRnKng@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGGgMJc2ceOOQ9Lcj1MbakXav3SLOHNTFo3Na8G5c-5SEpnzvw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2B1FSijzwf6xHOv7-CfmdFPmxD46vFEdaJ4V6xy29G4BYEetWA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGGgMJemKNkEB87sHABECYrQT37tzPcF74o6dejAz4=nMApCBQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B1FSigkus=xw6Y%2BQzD8hK9Dmkt6LR1hsY-U8V=yQ3yReTSL8g@mail.gmail.com> <CAGGgMJcVC33joaZ%2BdHsCBMHZ-hZPDt-9E8mL6Nvb=AdbVDQPqA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B1FSigZV6GXurd5KmBwVS6LdbOpP1fLK5wEB7-ROAp%2Bz1axsA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGGgMJd%2Box54CyDNk6SgQ29b=Rte=MzpRFbgzM%2BF=QWOV8nu=Q@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B1FSijkwMk_STP1wCyiX96VY7pn%2BmY-ad0_m1shFTBjQhd57Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAGGgMJcdSE=FBq%2BOZCf889uhE8n=av_MGrdn3pQe0qM6GQ9CxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B1FSiiYoxPCLcAhc=04WXnNwPMiWwxo9KDO_bYTgdQnFRw3Kg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGGgMJc2ceOOQ9Lcj1MbakXav3SLOHNTFo3Na8G5c-5SEpnzvw@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] --> Please read the bug I mentioned (comments #1 and #2) where the submitter only compiled a new vmm.ko and it didn't work without the corresponding bhyve. This is the reason why I asked : Can you offer a quick technical explanation of the reason why the exchange of the modules does not work for me ? and you didn't give me any answer. There should be no need to recompile vmm at all,because the first thing I did was to copy vmm.ko,bhyve-win and bhyve-lin from the UFS system where the problem is not present,to the ZFS system,where the problem is present. I have recompiled vmm.ko only for the sake of my curiosity. On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 12:49 AM Mark Peek <mp@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 3:34 PM Mario Marietto <marietto2008@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> --> Did you use the new bhyve binary you built from the patch ? >> >> I didn't recompile bhyve,since I don't need it. >> > > If you want the fix applied, you must compile and use both vmm.ko and > bhyve using the patch. The patch is used in both. > > Please read the bug I mentioned (comments #1 and #2) where the submitter > only compiled a new vmm.ko and it didn't work without the corresponding > bhyve. > > Mark > -- Mario. [-- Attachment #2 --] <div dir="ltr"><div>--> Please read the bug I mentioned (comments #1 and #2) where the submitter only compiled a new vmm.ko and it didn't work without the corresponding bhyve.</div><div><br></div><div>This is the reason why I asked :</div><div><br></div><div> Can you offer a quick technical explanation of the reason why the exchange of the modules does not work for me ?</div><div><br></div><div>and you didn't give me any answer. There should be no need to recompile vmm at all,because the first thing I did was to copy vmm.ko,bhyve-win and bhyve-lin from the UFS system where the problem is not present,to the ZFS system,where the problem is present. I have recompiled vmm.ko only for the sake of my curiosity.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br> </div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 12:49 AM Mark Peek <<a href="mailto:mp@freebsd.org">mp@freebsd.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 3:34 PM Mario Marietto <<a href="mailto:marietto2008@gmail.com" target="_blank">marietto2008@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>--> Did you use the new bhyve binary you built from the patch ?</div><div><div><br></div><div>I didn't recompile bhyve,since I don't need it.</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>If you want the fix applied, you must compile and use both vmm.ko and bhyve using the patch. The patch is used in both.</div><div><br></div><div>Please read the bug I mentioned (comments #1 and #2) where the submitter only compiled a new vmm.ko and it didn't work without the corresponding bhyve.</div><div><br></div><div>Mark </div></div></div> </blockquote></div><div><br clear="all"></div><br><span class="gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature">Mario.<br></div>help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2B1FSigejmmCyt5QfSxT2SkYEf0iLj6k6boT9inViasiQRnKng>