Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 02:17:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Lamont Granquist <lamont@scriptkiddie.org> To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc 3.1 / streambuf.h broken with "using namespace std;" Message-ID: <20020902021408.R14754-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> In-Reply-To: <20020901230840.GA37166@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 12:37:14PM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote: > > It sounds like gcc-3.1 or gcc-3.2 will be archaic and buggy > > by the time that 5.2 and 5.3 come out. > > How would gcc-3.2 get more buggy over time than it is today?? I said it was buggy. Do you mean to imply that gcc-3.2 doesn't have a single bug in it? Admittedly I should have said "unmaintained" though -- point being that the bugs in it wouldn't be getting fixed by gcc developers who would rather fix them in 3.3... > "archaic" does apply however. > > Why the fsck can't people come up to speed on an issue before spewing > FUD? I fail to see why assuming that a software project the size of the gcc compiler has a few bugs is "FUD"... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020902021408.R14754-100000>