Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 10:17:54 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Feldman <green@unixhelp.org> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: "ICMP_BANDLIM" Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812271009580.2020-100000@janus.syracuse.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Does anyone have an aversion to options "ICMP_BANDLIM" going into GENERIC? I
think it's very justifiable, and doesn't bloat the kernel unnecessarily (also,
Solaris and Linux, that I know of so far, also do this, so it's a pretty
standard thing). And how about using an option "ICMP_BANDLIM_SILENT" as well?
Sometimes you don't really want to see your message buffer filling up with
ICMP_BANDLIM messages, and option "ICMP_BANDLIM_SILENT" would probably go into
GENERIC too. If everyone thinks this is a good idea, I'll make the patches to
src/sys/netinet/ip_input.c src/sys/{i386,alpha}/conf/GENERIC
src/sys/i386/conf/options.i386 src/sys/alpha/conf/options.alpha and maybe PC98?
PC98 should probably be left alone...
Comments?
Brian Feldman _ __ ___ ___ ___
green@unixhelp.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
http://www.freebsd.org/ _ __ ___ ____ | _ \__ \ |) |
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ ___ ____ _____ |___/___/___/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9812271009580.2020-100000>