Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 18:23:14 +0000 From: Jonathan Looney <jlooney@juniper.net> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> Cc: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r296387 - head Message-ID: <D3032FF2.544FE%jlooney@juniper.net> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfo-imkuSNhRCWs47fucdOhraNRvk=pJNrLb-A8%2BfOmQSg@mail.gmail.com> References: <201603041603.u24G3F3V033038@repo.freebsd.org> <56D9BB1D.7040300@FreeBSD.org> <CANCZdfo-imkuSNhRCWs47fucdOhraNRvk=pJNrLb-A8%2BfOmQSg@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > It's trivial so worth having. We should discuss what our "oldest > supported upgrade" release should be as currently it is 8.1. > > We put it to 8.1 based on Juniper wanted it for their operations. > Normally we'd set this closer to 9.0 or something. If Juniper > no longer needs it, we should move up to 9.0 since that's typically > what we've done in the past at this point in the release cycle. I don't think Juniper cares about this anymore. Even if we do, I'm not sure why 8.1 would be the release we would choose (at least, at this point). Jonathanhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D3032FF2.544FE%jlooney>