Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 10:50:31 -0500 From: Chris <racerx@makeworld.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, FreeBSD - Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Cc: scottl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0R todo list - hash sizes Message-ID: <433EB047.4070809@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <20051001154628.GA64006@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20051001085358.GA62022@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20051001154628.GA64006@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:53:58AM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>scottl@ removed: >> <td>Nullfs (and perhaps other filesystems) use an absurdly small >> hash size that causes significant performance penalties.</td> >> >>this item from 6.0R todo list. How was this solved? I didnt see any commits >>to enlarge the hash values. Its still the same... why it was removed then? > > > It was an incorrect suggestion on my part - it turns out this was not > the cause of the performance penalties, and Jeff fixed them long ago. > > Kris > Somewhat off topic - what's the status of 6.0? The info on http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/schedule.html Has not been updated in some time and we're still on Beta5 -- Best regards, Chris Things equal to nothing else are equal to each other.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?433EB047.4070809>