Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 12:44:45 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Marcelo Araujo <araujo@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/trafshow Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <4D6AB7BD.2060203@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110227193203.GA38353@magic.hamla.org> References: <201102271441.p1REfMrT016669@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110227193203.GA38353@magic.hamla.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/27/2011 11:32, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 14:41:22 +0000, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > >> araujo 2011-02-27 14:41:22 UTC >> >> FreeBSD ports repository >> >> Modified files: >> net/trafshow Makefile distinfo >> Log: >> - Now can build with supporting of IPV6. >> - Removed MD5. >> - Bump PORTREVISION. > > If the IPv6 option is off by default (and thus, does not affect the > default package), why do you bump PORTREVISION? I just want to > understand for my own edification when dealing with similar situations. Sahil is right, if the change does not affect the package no bump is needed. OTOH, my personal feeling is that we should default all IPV6 knobs to on. :) Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D6AB7BD.2060203>