Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:15:34 +0800 From: LI Xin <delphij@delphij.net> To: Michael Bushkov <bushman@rsu.ru> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP]: OpenLDAP+nss_ldap+nss_modules separated patch and more (SoC) Message-ID: <44EABD26.9010803@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <002901c6c5ba$628b67d0$9800a8c0@carrera> References: <44E9582C.2010400@rsu.ru> <44EAA213.6010507@delphij.net> <002901c6c5ba$628b67d0$9800a8c0@carrera>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig81B5E39EFD83A6FEAC169946
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Michael Bushkov wrote:
> Hi,
> Li Xin wrote:
>> Would you please consider having the imported OpenLDAP to install shar=
ed
>> objects under alternative names? It might be painful for users who
>> wants OpenLDAP installation from the ports collection (as OpenLDAP tea=
m
>> moves fast and fixes bug from time to time) if they get a same library=
>> in /usr/lib...
>
> I've been thinking about that. Would names like "libldap_i.so" and
> "liblber_i.so" be ok ("_i" means "imported", or "internal")?
I am not an expert in this area :-) It seems that we call libxml
"libbsdxml" in the base system, though. Consult -arch@ if you like.
Cheers,
--------------enig81B5E39EFD83A6FEAC169946
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFE6r0mOfuToMruuMARA/8rAJwJpiM6AcXJ38o90NKEt0dLqJKPbACfetPz
CjlH8vybdZP6oEgCT8mv/2g=
=Gv59
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig81B5E39EFD83A6FEAC169946--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44EABD26.9010803>