Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 22:59:32 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> To: billf@chc-chimes.com (Bill Fumerola) Cc: imp@village.org (Warner Losh), obrien@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Import of tcsh into src/contrib/, replacing src/usr.bin/csh Message-ID: <200004070559.WAA39664@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <20000406221450.W23367@jade.chc-chimes.com> from Bill Fumerola at "Apr 6, 2000 10:14:50 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 08:10:13PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > In message <20000406134916.A23265@dragon.nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes: > > : highly irritated at root's shell being one of poor UI. Of the [t]csh > > : users I know, only about 10% use csh over tcsh and that is only because > > : csh is in the base system. Those people would not even notice the extra > > : tcsh features. > > > > I think this is a fine thing. > > Since the opposition to this seems to want to count people who said no, add > me as someone who says yes. > > I don't even use tcsh, either. So my support isn't because of some shell jihad. IMNSO people who don't use either tcsh or csh should exclude themselves from the discussion... Especially people who just say ``yes'' with no technical reasons for saying yes, your provided no supporting technical reasons for you yes :-( At least David O'Brien specifically said at the start of the thread he only wanted technical arguments for/against. Ohhh.. and this message has technical content, it's nit picking the fact that only a few people have provided technical content one way or the other, in a hope that we won't have a whole slew of <aol> me too's </aol> without the technical stuff to back it up. -- Rod Grimes - KD7CAX @ CN85sl - (RWG25) rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004070559.WAA39664>