Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:39:20 +0100 From: void <void@f-m.fm> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge Message-ID: <Zw_6SNSEW5mXMy_I@vm2> In-Reply-To: <CAGaXuiLG4Qv2KgDtJveN3adLh6b8tEzC4j6OYfLo1_dj8BKZWQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20240912181618.7895d10ad5ff2ebae9883192@gmail.com> <Zw3YGPIBC_s-q-Vg@vm2> <Zw3dlDuaSXsIG-yX@vm2> <CAGaXuiLG4Qv2KgDtJveN3adLh6b8tEzC4j6OYfLo1_dj8BKZWQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 09:48:58AM -0400, Cheng Cui wrote: >I am not sure if you are using FreeBSD15-CURRENT for testing in VMs. >But given your iperf3 test result has retransmissions, if you can try, there >is a recent VM friendly improvement from TCP congestion control CUBIC. > >commit ee45061051715be4704ba22d2fcd1c373e29079d I've just realised, your commit didn't land in main until 17th Sept so I'll need to buildworld etc on the bhyve *host* as it was last built on the 8th. Would this make a difference? The new vms are -current and have been built over the last couple of days, from fresh sources, so these will have your changes. The iperf3 destination is stable/14-n268832 amd64 1401502 1401502. --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Zw_6SNSEW5mXMy_I>