Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:55:27 +0200 From: Darksidex <humprhey@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade questions Message-ID: <424A778F.2010804@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <424A6E1B.3010709@ntlworld.com> References: <424A6E1B.3010709@ntlworld.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Richard Danter wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a mixture of ports and packages on my system. Mostly ports, but > since my machine is not all that fast I decided not to compile things > like OpenOffice.org for obvious reasons. > > I have two questions about portupgrade: man portupgrade > > 1. If I do "portupgrade -rR port" it will recompile the new version of > "port" and related ports as expected but it will also try to compile up > any packages that are dependent. Is there a way to tell it not to > upgrade packages, or to upgrade them using a new package? portupgrade -rRPP port => this will force portupgrade to use only ports > > 2. If, when initially compiling a port, I specified options to make (eg > "make USE_MOZILLA=firefox install clean") how do I ensure that > portupgrade will use the same options? /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf => Check MAKE_ARGS section -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFCSnePLWSOuibjjvIRAqekAJ4ga7032y1swfvkuLBn+xTql1kxYACfbE6/ deCEpn0INxgLi9yBYKAEU/M= =oJe3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?424A778F.2010804>