Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:06:41 -0400
From:      Martin Turgeon <freebsd@optiksecurite.com>
To:        Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
Cc:        Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: How is CPU usage calculated?
Message-ID:  <4CBCA8D1.5040005@optiksecurite.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimT_4D4THvszdDS=U0UKtScGgKZEN4A9e8BB2%2Bf@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20101015071719.1536f19e@mail.ose.nl> <4CBC97CB.80604@optiksecurite.com> <AANLkTimT_4D4THvszdDS=U0UKtScGgKZEN4A9e8BB2%2Bf@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
  Le 2010-10-18 15:12, Adam Vande More a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Martin Turgeon
> <freebsd@optiksecurite.com>wrote:
>
>> I didn't knew about -H to show individual threads, but my problem isn't
>> there. My problem is that the summary printed in the first lines doesn't
>> match the total of the process detailled under the summary. For example, I
>> have a user CPU usage est 83.1% in the summary, but the only process worth
>> mentionning in the list is mysqld that is taking 255.52% WCPU. That's far
>> less than half the "CPU power" but 83% is far more. It's that difference
>> that I don't understand.
>>
>> How is this possible?
>>
> man 1 top
>
> 83.1% doesn't mean what you think it does.
>
I just reread it and it isn't clearer what is using the CPU so much. Can 
you please give me a little more explanation?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CBCA8D1.5040005>