Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 17:12:37 -0500 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-git <freebsd-git@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Report on the pull request experiment so far Message-ID: <CAPyFy2D7MBsThAUYkVyh1Tg3UW8mAvBXL5wwmSKjpSsHFm5y1Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfoOm3iWZHvh6oy4Cj6qpcvnHjAWpbvNp7r9msfwO_r5fg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CANCZdfoOm3iWZHvh6oy4Cj6qpcvnHjAWpbvNp7r9msfwO_r5fg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 at 18:54, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > > I also landed one commit that was from 2021. Yikes. The commit date is ri= ght, but the author date is in the past. I suggest that we add a git commit= --amend --date=3D"`date`" to the process. This likely is a good thing. The= re's no simple --reset-date, alas: only a reset that also resets the author= . IMO we should just accept git's notion of separate author and commit dates, and not worry about author dates being in the past.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2D7MBsThAUYkVyh1Tg3UW8mAvBXL5wwmSKjpSsHFm5y1Q>