Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 23:43:29 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Cc: 0x1c <nick@feralmonkey.org> Subject: Re: auditors Message-ID: <199908100543.XAA10334@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[[ Sorry I missed this before, it has just been pointed out to me ]] On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, 0x1c wrote: > Well, fixes can be submitted, but it's no use unless they are implemented. > A large number of OpenBSD patches/fixes implement non-standard behaviour, > which often appear to be frowned upon by committers. At minimum these > should be considered if an option is given to revert to the historical > behaviour. I'm aware of a couple of very specific instances where the is the case (for example, the latest restriction to root of setting flags on files is different than historical behavior), but as a general rule this isn't the case. Can you be more specific? I don't think that the facts support this assertion... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908100543.XAA10334>