Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:37:56 +0400 From: Arseny Nasokin <tarc@tarc.po.cs.msu.su> To: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: HEADSUP: WITH and WITHOUT options knobs checking Message-ID: <20060627143756.GS32801@tarc.po.cs.msu.su>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It's wrong if you write in your Makefiles something about: --------------%<---------------- ... OPTIONS= ABC "Enable abc feature" off ... .include <bsd.port.pre.mk> ... .if defined (WITH_ABC) # configure ABC feature .endif ... .include <bsd.port.post.mk> ------------->%----------------- The main reason is that, ${OPTIONSFILE} included as is, and if you enable ABC(as in example), you have in ${OPTIONSFILE} something about: --------------%<---------------- ... WITH_ABC=true ... ------------->%----------------- Ok, and now some experiments. If ABC is feature, that you want enable im many ports (for example, OPTIMIZED_FLAGS or THREADS, or ESOUND/ESD.....) you possibly want add it to your /etc/make.conf file. cat WITH_ABC=true >> /etc/make.conf than, you want compile port, without this feature. You do `make config' and as result in your ${OPTIONSFILE} you have: --------------%<---------------- ... WITHOUT_ABC=true ... ------------->%----------------- And now - compile... when you type `make build' you have defined BOTH `WITH_ABC' and `WITHOUT_ABC' knobs and as you check _only_ WITH_ABC, this feature included. That's wrong!!! Please, check WITH_ knobs, as it: .if defined (WITH_ABC) && ! defined(WITHOUT_ABC) -- Best regards, Arseny Nasokin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060627143756.GS32801>