Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 22:52:49 -0700 From: David Greenman <dg@root.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: steve@visint.co.uk, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Intel Etherexpress PRO/100+ PCI Message-ID: <199805130552.WAA04275@implode.root.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 13 May 1998 01:51:29 -0000." <199805130151.SAA26286@usr09.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>The int that is reported by FreeBSD should match the PCI mapping. > >For example: > > ... int a irq 10 ... > ... int a irq 11 ... > ... int a irq 12 ... > ... int a irq 13 ... > >Should be reported based on the PCI mapping of PCI bridge pins to >irq's. > >That is, reporting "int a" is incorrect, since "a" is not the PCI >bridge pin, it's the slot pin. Perhaps that should be reported when probing the bridge chip, and I have no problem with that, but the information that comes out for the PCI card is correct in that it is reporting info about the card and not about the bridge mapping. I'm not arguing against what you are saying, just pointing out the way it works, which is different than they way you thought it worked. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805130552.WAA04275>