Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 22:40:19 +0900 (JST) From: ITO Tsuyoshi <tsuyoshi@is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: portsmgr@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:06.openssl Message-ID: <20030322.224019.112630843.tsuyoshi@is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <SwUKKpX9Sw@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> References: <200303212052.h2LKqYWw013362@freefall.freebsd.org> <20030322.210923.71081935.tsuyoshi@is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <SwUKKpX9Sw@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 14:04:43 +0100 > port is updated, but not yet committed. > I will commit it after the freeze is lifted. > > It is not as critical as the last advisory. I see. I was afraid that the patch for the problem (2) was completely forgotten for the port, because no PRs were found on http://www.jp.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports > Its portsmgr decision to retag. (CC with this mail) Sorry, I do not understand this sentence. Maybe the portsmgr's decision is _not_ to move the RELEASE_4_8_0 tag? Anyway, I am releaved to know the patch is not forgotten. Thanks for the explanation. Best regards, Tsuyoshi --- ITO Tsuyoshi <tsuyoshi@is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> --- --- Dept. of Computer Science, University of Tokyo. --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030322.224019.112630843.tsuyoshi>