Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:51:37 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: More about recent IPFW changes Message-ID: <20040819185137.GB44480@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <4124F5A1.5090303@freebsd.org> References: <20040819152456.GE81657@ip.net.ua> <4124F5A1.5090303@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--NMuMz9nt05w80d4+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 08:46:57PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >Andre, > > > >Besides what was already told about PFIL_HOOKS and > >IPFIREWALL coupling... > > > >What are your plans about syncing the documentation > >and rc(8) scripts with your recent changes? > > > >There was also an API change: net.inet.ip.fw.enable > >is no longer available, the removal wasn't mentioned > >in your HEADS UP nor in the commit log, and this now > >breaks /etc/rc.d/ipfw. What's the replacement for > >this sysctl, to disable firewall in run-time? >=20 > Everything fixed now. :-) >=20 These were hot hours for you, Andre. ;) May I ask that you please document your changes in src/UPDATING, especially the new requirement for the IPFIREWALL option, its dependency on PFIL_HOOKS? Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBJPa5qRfpzJluFF4RAuTIAJ9QK42EfnkK4BcNr1/2Knurr9DLIwCeKtV9 NOYp0nT/rBoMkRneIDitoaE= =sqEr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040819185137.GB44480>