Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 12:28:33 +0100 (MET) From: torstenb@solar.tlk.com (Torsten Blum) To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: torstenb@tlk.com, coredump@nervosa.com, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/libwww - Imported sources Message-ID: <m0tv0LZ-00021vC@solar.tlk.com> In-Reply-To: <199603081106.DAA20788@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Mar 8, 96 03:06:28 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Satoshi Asami wrote: > * I don't think it makes much sense to put libwww into the www > * directory because its useless for joe-average-user. It does not > * contain any executables (like tiff or jpeg for example)... > > Um, whether it's useful for Joe FreeBSD user is not an issue here. We > never classified ports by skill level. :) I meant: it's only usefull for people who want to develop a www application with this particular library. autoconf, bcc, bison and so on are not useful for "Joe FreeBSD user" - that's why they are in the "devel" directory... -tb
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m0tv0LZ-00021vC>