Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 13:04:08 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: liamfoy@sepulcrum.org Cc: i386@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 Message-ID: <20040625.130408.122318525.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20040625173503.3f8c2b0c.liamfoy@sepulcrum.org> References: <20040625162945.5f67d584.liamfoy@sepulcrum.org> <xzppt7nzjjd.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040625173503.3f8c2b0c.liamfoy@sepulcrum.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20040625173503.3f8c2b0c.liamfoy@sepulcrum.org>
"Liam J. Foy" <liamfoy@sepulcrum.org> writes:
: On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:31:18 +0200
: des@des.no (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) wrote:
:
: > "Liam J. Foy" <liamfoy@sepulcrum.org> writes:
: > > I think this should solve the problem, correct me if am wrong. =)
: >
: > No, that just shoves it under the carpet.
: Maybe you could explain why ?
Because it just initializes the variable without understanding WHY it
is uninitialized, or what the right default value might be.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040625.130408.122318525.imp>