Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 11:52:06 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Review: change NGROUPS_MAX from 16 to 64 Message-ID: <20011002115206.M74839@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011001170012.86907B-100000@fledge.watson.org>; from rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 05:04:51PM -0400 References: <20010929200940.A10366@skriver.dk> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1011001170012.86907B-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
What's the reason why KI_NGROUPS should be different from NGROUPS_MAX? On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 05:04:51PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > Note this will break binary compatibility for xucred. Note also that this > may have fascinating effects in NFS environments. Note also that you'll > probably want to update KI_NGROUPS also. No idea if it will affect NIS. > > Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project > robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011002115206.M74839>