Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 21:32:53 +0700 From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> To: Joe <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> Cc: Michael Ross <gmx@ross.cx>, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: use of the kernel and licensing Message-ID: <20130401213253.36230873@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <51599907.3010802@a1poweruser.com> References: <CAJ%2Bvzi9RZN5F50fCDJBGJ23R2%2BrhAsC10WSt_PMeFhO=WU3UZA@mail.gmail.com> <20130331001209.GA69583@neutralgood.org> <51583C91.5060000@a1poweruser.com> <20130331163143.aabedff2.freebsd@edvax.de> <op.wute6pxgg7njmm@michael-think> <20130331170902.bbcd8179.freebsd@edvax.de> <51599907.3010802@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:26:15 -0400 Joe <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> wrote: > snip.... > > How do you explain all the forks of UNIX each claiming their own > copyright. They all provide the same concept, use the same names for > their commands, use the same programming language, have a filesystem > as their base. Just where is the line drawn between a fork and a > rewrite? just go back in history and find out why the AT&T code in BSD was rewritten. Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130401213253.36230873>