Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 20:43:12 -0700 From: Murray Stokely <murray@freebsd.org> To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@nitro.dk> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Application and command names in <title> elements Message-ID: <20030519204312.K8403@freebsdmall.com> In-Reply-To: <20030519203451.GB1120@nitro.dk>; from simon@nitro.dk on Mon, May 19, 2003 at 10:34:52PM %2B0200 References: <20030519192255.GB74434@submonkey.net> <20030519153048.51f20a06.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030519200900.GA1120@nitro.dk> <20030519161700.27143841.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030519203451.GB1120@nitro.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 10:34:52PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> > > <comment by Murray from docs/50790 audit trail>
> > > One thing to note is
> > > that it doesn't look good to use the man page entities twice in close
> > > proximity. So I used &man.dumpon.8; the first time, then just used
> > > <command>dumpon</command> elsewhere in the paragraph.
> > > </comment>
> > >
> > > I think this is seems like a good way since the man reference is still
> > > nice to have.
> >
> > Ok, I see the logic here. Thanks guys.
>
> Perhaps it would be a good idea to add a short note about this to the
> section about "Applications, commands, options, and cites" in the FDP
> primer ?
>
> I can make a patch if it sounds like a good idea...
Yes I'd like to see this documented. Please send us a patch! ;)
- Murray
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030519204312.K8403>