Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:48:13 -0500 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: autoconf/automake guru wanted [gnuplot-4.0 with patches] Message-ID: <op.tyuzmnmc9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <20070918172922.32c0b904@gumby.homeunix.com.> References: <46EFE5E6.9000602@cosmozilla.net> <20070918172922.32c0b904@gumby.homeunix.com.>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:29:22 -0500, RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> wrot= e: > On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:51:18 -0700 > Ted Thomas <tthomas@cosmozilla.net> wrote: > >> I'm sorry if this sounds like a complaint. I just spent 2 days >> attempting to salvage a sane 6.2 development box which does not use >> X-Windows, because I stumbled into the Xorg quagmire. Recognizing >> that the ports system is itself a remarkable achievement, I would >> distill my concern down to one thing: naming conventions. >> >> Example 1: autoconf/automake >> >> autoconf-2.59_3 =3D up-to-date with port >> autoconf-2.61_2 =3D up-to-date with port > These two are no problem, they are different ports. > >> autoconf-wrapper-20070404 =3D up-to-date with port >> .. >> automake-wrapper-20070404 =3D up-to-date with port > > This shouldn't happen, do you have multiple entries in /var/db/pkg? Did you misread it? :-) The *-wrapper is correct and normal. # pkg_info -IX wrapper autoconf-wrapper-20070404 Wrapper script for GNU autoconf automake-wrapper-20070404 Wrapper script for GNU automake Cheers, Mezz -- = mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - multimedia@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.tyuzmnmc9aq2h7>