Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:17:51 -0400 From: jhell <jhell@dataix.net> To: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [CFT] [sys/conf/newvers.sh] Cleanup and additions. Message-ID: <4C62246F.3080704@dataix.net> In-Reply-To: <86eie5lxxn.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4C61C50E.8040900__28807.0786548362$1281476071$gmane$org@dataix.net> <86hbj2qc0n.fsf@gmail.com> <4C61F00A.6050408@dataix.net> <86zkwukjtn.fsf@gmail.com> <86eie5lxxn.fsf@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/10/2010 21:50, Anonymous wrote: > Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> writes: > >> jhell <jhell@dataix.net> writes: >>> >>> And that would be to identify non-conforming ports using non-standard >>> locations. Though the option is available to look in a non-standard >> >> You're confusing default and standard value. LOCALBASE has a default for >> /usr/local. If it were a standard one wouldn't care about it and just >> hardcode /usr/local everywhere. > > ...or at least used `=' and not `?=' in bsd.port.mk. The only mention I see of LOCALBASE in all of source on stable/8 is: /usr/src/contrib/bind9/config.threads.in /usr/src/secure/usr.bin/ssh/Makefile /usr/src/secure/usr.sbin/sshd/Makefile /usr/src/tools/kerneldoc/subsys/Makefile /usr/src/tools/regression/atm/Funcs.sh /usr/src/tools/regression/atm/proto_cc/RunTest.sh /usr/src/tools/regression/atm/proto_sscfu/RunTest.sh /usr/src/tools/regression/atm/proto_sscop/RunTest.sh /usr/src/tools/regression/atm/proto_uni/RunTest.sh /usr/src/tools/tools/tinybsd/CHANGES /usr/src/usr.bin/make/Makefile So what your telling me is we would have to pull in something else to do this just for newvers.sh or is this sinking into the source from somewhere I am not aware of? -- jhell,v
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C62246F.3080704>