Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:29:56 -0700 From: Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PAM modules Message-ID: <4E738794.4050908@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <86boukbk8s.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <86boukbk8s.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 09/16/11 08:05, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > We currently have a number of PAM modules in ports, and while some > of them are specific to certain third-party software, many aren't. > I believe we would benefit from importing at least some of these > into base. My question is: which ones? LDAP? (We do currently have some work on LDAP integration but not sure if the community would be interested -- this would need an import of stripped down OpenLDAP) and modifies OpenSSH to support public key in LDAP directory. Cheers, - -- Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOc4eUAAoJEATO+BI/yjfBUFgH/1+fWilKMu/4YJu0X2hUpDJI EvOuG1Mx481eXAaTV+yfVaHwGs039EQIgJpk18CCC+UbCOV4kG0B0XpK5D3VdOPE nHoXB38YiiyBe+LVYg3u1YPrjPAoULK2ih4qMOki6Wbtw8EqV344BNd0a70joY+z JTnNsfJQcMKAO8RpppPxuf/yy6goRcQSMUmDCvxBiOS923vZu641kyBEzyFeC+GU BJjLTXxcBQ5V9XNGgHmp7g4nwHPNwi0aOPs6Gudgj7u3hKKEkcY//Irdac+chopF St4AJBCffsdl49TbQMYKUvTSIyUb5YeI8ixtFzwhhdGUZLEPDOvtOJNooCd1x/w= =VRQC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E738794.4050908>