Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:20:18 -0400 From: Ben Kelly <ben@wanderview.com> To: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r197218 - head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs Message-ID: <07CC63B9-2303-4AE6-B285-5532F839E660@wanderview.com> In-Reply-To: <4AAF944F.1040209@errno.com> References: <200909151134.n8FBYr8F086888@svn.freebsd.org> <4AAF944F.1040209@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 15, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Sam Leffler wrote: > Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >> Author: pjd >> Date: Tue Sep 15 11:34:53 2009 >> New Revision: 197218 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/197218 >> Log: >> We believe ZFS is ready for production use. Remove a warning about >> it being >> experimental. :) > > This is great news! Is this amd64 only (or i386 too)? How about > non-x86 architectures (have people tested on sparc64, ppc, etc)? My experience with i386 was that the zfs ARC code caused significant kmem fragmentation. While I have not tested this with recent commits, I haven't seen anything that would lead me to believe its fixed either. I seem to recall Kip said he was working on UMA changes or something like that to address the problem. - Ben
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?07CC63B9-2303-4AE6-B285-5532F839E660>