Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:27:07 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Istv=C3=A1n?= <leccine@gmail.com> To: Marian Hettwer <mh@kernel32.de> Cc: vadim_nuclight@mail.ru, freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Andy Kosela <akosela@andykosela.com>, Pieter de Boer <pieter@thelostparadise.com> Subject: Re: tcpdump -z Message-ID: <AANLkTikgbBzUmd0fBaGfQQqR_SFXA82yhBk0WAffX-Si@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5d88fc9506514cabc7390e66a1f9872f@localhost> References: <slrni7eu1h.21lb.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net> <4C77A267.10102@thelostparadise.com> <AANLkTim1frPvChMJfDLnHe6LW3HnR=AWeYcCsf-tx3V-@mail.gmail.com> <5d88fc9506514cabc7390e66a1f9872f@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well to be honest i don't see any case when i want to give sudo+tcpdump access to any user on my box. And those who are admins/roots anyway the "su -" just works perfectly and they can run tcpdump. IMHO I. On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Marian Hettwer <mh@kernel32.de> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:02:43 +0200, Andy Kosela > <akosela@andykosela.com> wrote: > > > > > If you care about security I would definetly dump sudo(8) in the > > first place... > > > Why is that? I'd like to hear some good reasons why one should not use > sudo(8) if one's interested in security. > > Quite the opposite is true, imo. > > So... hej, do you have facts to backup that claim? I'd be really > interested! > > > ./Marian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > -- the sun shines for all http://l1xl1x.blogspot.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikgbBzUmd0fBaGfQQqR_SFXA82yhBk0WAffX-Si>