Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 11:30:07 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella <jrh@it.uc3m.es> Cc: Lista <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: NAT Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0202191129580.58281-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <3C7251E9.4B250385@it.uc3m.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
what's NAT4? On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella wrote: > Hello, > I have been doing some perfomance tests using the standard NAT > implementation for FreeBsd, and also using NAT-PT, with the KAME > implementation. > > In throughput and delay terms, the results are much worse for NAT4. > > May that result be due to the overloading introduced by ALG in the > standard implementation? Maybe it has to analyse the packets deeper?? > > Thanks in advance. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0202191129580.58281-100000>