Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 01:14:48 -0400 From: NetAdmin <daemon@foxchat.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run? Message-ID: <1097298888.80029.4.camel@foxdaemon.com> In-Reply-To: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNGEHFEPAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> References: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNGEHFEPAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-4KWLd+Orh6+/8h9YWdIS Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable dang, how long is this thread gonna go on? Is it that important? I see a lot of good questions and equally good answers on this list, but I think this particular thread is starting to stoop beneath us all... On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 00:56, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of TM4525@aol.com > > Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 7:40 PM > > To: krinklyfig@spymac.com > > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run? > >=20 > >=20 > > In a message dated 10/8/04 2:25:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time,=20 > > krinklyfig@spymac.com writes: > > > You guys are the ones making the claims that 5.3 is "going to be > > > so great". I just wonder how you come to that conclusion if you > > > don't have any definitive tests. I dont have a release to test, so > > > when its done I'll test it. > >=20 --=20 NetAdmin for the FoxChat.Net IRC Network. The FoxSurfer Group --=-4KWLd+Orh6+/8h9YWdIS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBZ3PINirmlL8R/7sRApx5AJ9gu5d88gOXLFItO8nQSOiM3XlQxwCfZtsL s7oVflqAxdhS/QQrr87gi3U= =KI4m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-4KWLd+Orh6+/8h9YWdIS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1097298888.80029.4.camel>