Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 22:19:58 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Missing Copyright? Message-ID: <20211023051958.GA79022@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfpz0PMFy1ckB3Zza6kTBPud6xSCwxsPEPJu4FtrRo492Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <20211023031336.GA78631@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CANCZdfpz0PMFy1ckB3Zza6kTBPud6xSCwxsPEPJu4FtrRo492Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner, Thanks for the quick response. If I have time I'll rig up my build to disable the use of assembly routines on x86_64 and any compiler builtin functions to do some testing of these routines. On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 10:05:38PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > Done. > https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=3550a49f6814af38c21b0033ef8746953451dade > > Since the license is a verbatim copy of the standard SPDX license, I tagged > it using our draft license policy's > suggested SPDX-License-Identifier: tag. > > Warner > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 9:14 PM Steve Kargl < > sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > It seems that git commit f5542795b99206a2b4e5a57429d18b9478264e24 > > replaced the fdlibm implementations of s_scalbn.c, s_scalbnf.c, > > and s_scalbnl.c by those in MUSL. There are no Copyright > > notices in these files. There is no statement to the originals > > of these files within the files. > > > > If one looks at https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/COPYRIGHT > > one finds: > > > > musl as a whole is licensed under the following standard MIT license: > > (trimmed) -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20211023051958.GA79022>