Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 21:21:08 +0200 From: Kristof Provost <kp@FreeBSD.org> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> Cc: ivy@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: epair(4) Message-ID: <406249F9-B0FC-4E22-9402-683531321E72@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20250515185919.87008219@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <20250515162552.9209B20E@slippy.cwsent.com> <20250515185919.87008219@slippy.cwsent.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 15 May 2025, at 20:59, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <20250515162552.9209B20E@slippy.cwsent.com>, Cy Schubert writes: >> Over the last couple of days epair(4) fails to set up when an IP address is >> specified. >> >> bob# service jail onestart test2 >> Starting jails: cannot start jail "test2": >> epair0a >> ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): Invalid argument >> jail: test2: /sbin/ifconfig epair0a inet 10.1.1.70 netmask 0xffffff00 up: >> failed >> . >> bob# ifconfig epair0a inet 10.1.1.70 netmask 0xffffff00 >> ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): Invalid argument >> bob# ifconfig epair0a inet up >> bob# > > This regression is caused by b61850c4e6f6. > Is epair0a a member of a bridge? If so, that’s a configuration error which is now prevented (by default). Best regards, Kristofhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?406249F9-B0FC-4E22-9402-683531321E72>