Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 18:15:37 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Removing wait union Message-ID: <20020603181537.A37707@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <3CFC00A9.BD98B7BD@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 04:50:01PM -0700 References: <20020602010108.B16166@espresso.q9media.com> <20020603011903.Y2566-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <20020603162508.A34224@xor.obsecurity.org> <3CFC00A9.BD98B7BD@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 04:50:01PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 01:22:14AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > I think the only potential problem is use of the compatibility cruft > > > in deprecware outside the base system. It would be useful to have a > > > quick way to determine how many ports a change in a standard header > > > affects. > > > > I'm always happy to test proposed patches on the ports cluster. > > I think the problem needs something other than the ports cluster. > > The ports cluster is designed to keep dependencies seperate, so it > serializes a lot of things that could otherwise be done in parallel, > to ensure dependency order is maintained. In practise this isn't an issue. I haven't obtained accurate statistics, but the cluster runs at full capacity for pretty much the entire build. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE8/BS4Wry0BWjoQKURAvWOAKCQt/P/VD9jj0zBlrtmBTfG1mGEQQCfcm/h ATIZw/8RRqhb/gB7qGgu8r4= =itUr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020603181537.A37707>