Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:17:52 -0500 From: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: Alternate patch to have true new-style rc.d ports scripts(without touching localpkg) Message-ID: <790a9fff040729071745b541d3@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4108B7C5.5000802@fillmore-labs.com> References: <4108B7C5.5000802@fillmore-labs.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:39:33 +0200, Oliver Eikemeier
<eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> wrote:
> The bsd.port.mk integration might be something like
>
> RC_SCRIPTS= apache
>
> which will install `apache' or `apache.sh' depending on OSVERSION. A
> variable RC_SUFX is set that could be used in pkg-message or other
> places when necessary.
>
You read my bsd.port.mk :-).
I have already created the above in my bsd.port.mk in the begining of
the year. Except that I have it setup as:
RC_SCRIPTS= script1 script2:0000 script3:0001
Then depending on OSVERSION the scripts are installed as:
etc/rc.d/script1.sh
etc/rc.d/0000.script2.sh
etc/rc.d/0001.script3.sh
or on FreeBSD 5.x +
etc/rc.d/script1{.sh,}
etc/rc.d/script2{.sh,}
etc/rc.d/script3{.sh,}
Currently, I have the removal of ".sh" set for FreeBSD 6.x in my bsd.port.mk.
Scot
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?790a9fff040729071745b541d3>