Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 19:17:56 -0700 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniel Gerzo <danger@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>, Mikolaj Golub <to.my.trociny@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Weird issue with hastd(8) Message-ID: <4DDDB854.50306@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4DDD537A.7090408@FreeBSD.org> References: <4DDD4890.70604@FreeBSD.org> <4DDD4964.7060008@sippysoft.com> <4DDD537A.7090408@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/25/2011 12:07 PM, Daniel Gerzo wrote: > I can only confirm this behavior. I have already reported this to > Mikolaj and we are trying to hunt down the problem. I have started > observing suddenly after some update. Unfortunately I haven't noted > which revision I started to observe this bug ;( > > Do you happen to use some net.inet sysctls/tunables? Not really. The only sysctls we override are UDP ones: net.inet.udp.blackhole=1 # --SSP-- net.inet.udp.recvspace=332800 # --SSP-- net.inet.udp.maxdgram=57344 # --SSP-- net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_wrong_iface=0 # - But at least it is good to know that we are not alone with this issue. -Maxim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DDDB854.50306>