Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:45:21 -0500 From: David Schultz <das@freebsd.org> To: Ulrich =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sp=F6rlein?= <uqs@spoerlein.net> Cc: doc-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/projects/c99 index.sgml Message-ID: <20101206204521.GA37990@zim.MIT.EDU> In-Reply-To: <20101206200907.GO3256@acme.spoerlein.net> References: <201012052331.oB5NVeMq060741@repoman.freebsd.org> <20101206200907.GO3256@acme.spoerlein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > On Sun, 05.12.2010 at 23:31:40 +0000, David Schultz wrote: > > das 2010-12-05 23:31:40 UTC > > > > FreeBSD doc repository (src committer) > > > > Modified files: > > en/projects/c99 index.sgml > > Log: > > Update a bunch of entries to reflect their current status (to the best > > of my knowledge.) > > \o/ > > Thanks for doing this, the page used to look pretty abandoned. Alas, the > "Last Updated" column makes me sad :( I didn't try to update things I didn't feel I knew enough about, or things that I would have had to research. Feel free to make any further updates or pass them along to me. I unfortunately don't have time to deal with all of it since mike@ disappeared. > Btw, do we really want to have the SCCS toolset in FreeBSD? I mean, > seriously? Certainly not. :) It's still on the list to remind people to think about how to address it. In general there are three strategies: 1. Bring the base system into compliance. 2. Add a port and document where people can find it. 3. Document why we do not support it. I think the original plan was to have a posix(7) to document what FreeBSD does and doesn't support and why, but we could just as easily have a section in the manual if someone wants to take that project on.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101206204521.GA37990>