Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 07:29:44 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237054] java/openjdk11: Needs to be integrated into bsd.java.mk Message-ID: <bug-237054-8522-oZrF1leQKZ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237054-8522@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237054-8522@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237054 --- Comment #19 from Tommy P <tommyhp2@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Greg Lewis from comment #18) I understand about + specified in the JAVA_VERSION of the port. But when JAVA_VERSION=1.6 is specified in make.conf, shouldn't it build using java/openjdk6 and that it also complies with the port requirement of 1.6+? If not and selects the latest available ie java/openjdk8, then I think we may have a problem. Since JDK 11 is LTS and many would want to use that in production, how can we explicitly specify to use JDK 11 then and not automatically select 12 because it's the most current? I see another use case for explicit version: deskutils/nextcloudclient/Makefile:50:BROKEN= nextcloudclient requires OpenSSL 1.1.0, add DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl111 to /etc/make.conf www/squid3/Makefile:284:BROKEN= Does not build on FreeBSD 12 with OpenSSL 1.1. You may add DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl to /etc/make.conf as a workaround -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237054-8522-oZrF1leQKZ>