Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 23:30:38 +1000 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu, jkh@time.cdrom.com Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, jdp@polstra.com, rob@ideal.net.au Subject: Re: IPDIVERT broken? Message-ID: <199705211330.XAA26062@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
> * It seems that if we are to survive as a project in the long-term, > * developers are going to have to take greater responsibility for their > * actions and be willing to follow *all* the way through on any changes > * made, repairing the results of any interface changes and essentially > * just being willing to make things work again on a tree-wide basis if > * they break. > >I think this sentence is too long, but I agree 100%. I agree with this out of context quote. Developers should repair the results of any interface changes to their code. Changers shouldn't be expected to do it all. Brucehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705211330.XAA26062>