Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 14:47:05 -0700 From: bmah@acm.org (Bruce A. Mah) To: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/common new.sgml Message-ID: <200305082147.h48Ll5xV017960@bmah.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20030508212210.GZ26372@procyon.firepipe.net> References: <200305082109.h48L9deO082933@repoman.freebsd.org> <200305082120.h48LKExV017697@bmah.dyndns.org> <20030508212210.GZ26372@procyon.firepipe.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_-1112881182P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Will Andrews wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 02:20:14PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > Approved by: re (implicitly) > > > > If anyone knows how to make emacs's version control put up something > > resembling our CVS commit message template file when I commit, I'd > > greatly appreciate it. I must do this four or five times every release. > > You're part of re@. It should be obvious that if a member of re@ > commits something that requires re@ approval, it has it. ;) In a sense, you're right, but I should still try to set a good example by making sure I put the right contents in these fields. You know this, but in case anyone else was wondering: REs *do* ask for approvals from each other for commits that don't directly pertain to release-building (or areas of blanket commit authority), so being a member of re@ isn't a free pass to walk all over the tree during the code freeze. :-) Bruce. --==_Exmh_-1112881182P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506 iD8DBQE+utBZ2MoxcVugUsMRAki0AKDz/P+HMrOZlXZ0LFR+DpVMJF+1YgCfYmo8 8UVeAPyYkkKMZM1jhSmzv48= =fndA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-1112881182P--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200305082147.h48Ll5xV017960>