Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:36:38 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: audit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: We need to do an audit of our "crypto", both current and planned. Message-ID: <200001131936.e0DJagw71253@gratis.grondar.za> In-Reply-To: <39393.947786197@zippy.cdrom.com> ; from "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> "Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:56:37 PST." References: <39393.947786197@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I'm nervous ("paranoid") that "declared" code is somehow set in stone,
> > er, red tape, and needs to be "re-declared" after any change.
>
> I appreciate this, but I certainly don't see anything in the agreement
> so far which implies this, and I would expect some far more vocal and
> far richer open source players to scream blue murder over this if it
> were a one-off deal on the declaration. Everyone involved has got to
> know that the code changes too rapidly to make any other approach
> practical.
Rapid change is something that us "open-sourcers" understand well.
Congresscritters understand dusty tomes sitting on shelves with no
changes.
As long as change is somewhere written for the lawman to see, I reckon
I'm happy :-)
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001131936.e0DJagw71253>