Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:59:42 +0200 From: Ulrich Spoerlein <uspoerlein@gmail.com> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.own.mk Message-ID: <20071014165942.GA1478@roadrunner.spoerlein.net> In-Reply-To: <20071012081105.C6043@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <200710120803.l9C83pLM093240@repoman.freebsd.org> <20071012081105.C6043@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 12.10.2007 at 08:27:47 +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > Is there any chance to get bind back w/o threading support? I guess > the question is more to Doug than to you. > > I found it usefull especially for (CF) installations where I > neither needed pppctl nor any other thing that depended on a threading > library but a caching nameserver. Going with a port for this > means supporting the ports infrastructure respectively an extra > installation procedure. Nothing that can't be done just extra pain;-) > So far it was easier to go with just base and live with the size of > named. Can't nscd aka cached be used for this now? Or is it not caching DNS lookups yet? Cheers, Ulrich Spoerlein -- It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak, and remove all doubt.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071014165942.GA1478>