Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 22:19:27 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com>, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: kernel module options (was ipfw2 broken) Message-ID: <20040819191927.GI44480@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20040819180840.GV99980@funkthat.com> References: <1092881027.999.3.camel@server.mcneil.com> <412497B5.6040203@freebsd.org> <4124D1D4.5080307@samsco.org> <200408191251.32319.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <4124E1DA.B5341C04@freebsd.org> <1092938019.79038.4.camel@server.mcneil.com> <20040819180840.GV99980@funkthat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--jQIvE3yXcK9X9HBh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 11:08:40AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Sean McNeil wrote this message on Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 10:53 -0700: > > On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 10:22, Andre Oppermann wrote: > > > IPDIVERT wasn't compiled into the module before. It's surrounded by > > > #if !defined(KLD_MODULE). However if the kernel was compiled with op= tion > > > IPDIVERT but w/o IPFIREWALL is was working anyway. > >=20 > > Has this changed? From what I saw yesterday no option in my config file > > could possibly effect the compilation of the ipfw2 module. The only way > > I could see doing it was to modify the Makefile for the module. yuk. > >=20 > > I would like to see a general mechanism supported to turn on various > > options within a module build. Would it be possible to fix module > > building to honor options from the config? >=20 > I had a set of changes a while back that would link all of the opt_*.h > files in the various module's dirs back to the ones in the main kernel > compile assuming that there wasn't a specific rule in the Makefile to > build that file. I.e. 99% of the opt_*.h rules could be eliminated. >=20 > This solution was decided to be inadaquate, and was not accepted, but > I again propose it. It quick and easy. >=20 And how the standalone module could be built if you eliminated 99% of opt_*.h rules from module makefiles? Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --jQIvE3yXcK9X9HBh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBJP0/qRfpzJluFF4RArs/AJ4hLHDhGxzQScfXblf33K9ZCZzM8ACfccw5 tqD8Q0c2u5Fpql4U3If0Ds0= =XVRM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jQIvE3yXcK9X9HBh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040819191927.GI44480>