Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:16:14 -0700 From: Freddie Cash <fjwcash+freebsd@gmail.com> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.0-BETA1.5 ISO/ftp Message-ID: <200710291016.15064.fjwcash%2Bfreebsd@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20071027122454.GA15883@outcold.yadt.co.uk> References: <200710252120.l9PLKYFJ041330@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> <200710251516.19505.fjwcash%2Bfreebsd@gmail.com> <20071027122454.GA15883@outcold.yadt.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On October 27, 2007 05:24 am David Taylor wrote: > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Freddie Cash wrote: > > On October 25, 2007 03:07 pm Erik Trulsson wrote: > > > But csup does not yet support CVS mode, so you can't use it to > > > maintain a local copy of the repository. For some people > > > (including me) this means that csup is not yet a suitable > > > replacement for CVSup. > > > > Maybe not, but for the bulk of the users of cvsup, csup is a drop-in > > replacement. :) As with most things in Unix-land, there's more than > > one way to do things, and every one will defend to the death their > > way of doing things. :D > > I think the point is there _isn't_ more than one way to cvsup the CVS > repo - csup currently cannot do that. Fine, to end the arguments: for non-developer, "normal" users, who only use cvsup to update their source tree for a normal buildworld cycle (and for the ports tree for those who haven't moved to portsnap), csup is a drop-in replacement for cvsup. There, does that make the lot of you pedants happy? :D -- Freddie Cash, LPIC-2 CCNT CCLP Network Support Technician School District 73 (250) 377-HELP [377-4357] fjwcash+freebsd@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200710291016.15064.fjwcash%2Bfreebsd>