Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 12:09:07 -0400 From: Jason Andresen <jandrese@mitre.org> To: "Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu>, ccf@master.ndi.net, gordont@bluemtn.net, jkh@osd.bsdi.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: technical comparison Message-ID: <3B0A8F23.F47DCCEB@mitre.org> References: <200105220411.f4M4BDX101825@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <3B0A8DD5.9A38449B@mitre.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jason Andresen wrote: Oops, I fubbed up the linux at 60000 files test, I'm rerunning it now, but it will take a while to finish. > Results: > ufs+softupdates is a little slower than ext2fs+wc for low numbers of > files, but scales better. I wish I had a Reiserfs partition to > test with. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B0A8F23.F47DCCEB>