Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      05 Apr 2002 10:19:19 -0800
From:      John Merryweather Cooper <john_m_cooper@yahoo.com>
To:        obrien@freebsd.org
Cc:        Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>, mike@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/yacc main.c
Message-ID:  <1018030764.4511.22.camel@johncoop.MSHOME>
In-Reply-To: <20020405100427.A46969@dragon.nuxi.com>
References:  <20020405003033.F93859@espresso.q9media.com> <200204051656.g35GuUnF010963@aldan.algebra.com>  <20020405100427.A46969@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 10:04, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:56:30AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > On  5 Apr, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> > > David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > >> On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 07:17:57PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > >> > I'm scared of the vision of countless thousands of computers
> > >> > calling strlen(temp_form) and constantly coming up with the same
> > >> > number -- 16. Are you not?
> > >>
> > >> You are shitting me aren't you? I could find _thousands_ of such
> > >> constant results in /usr/src.
> > >
> > > Indeed. Code readability always beats unmeasureable performance losses
> > > hands-down.
> > 
> > Common, how is sizeof(foo) less (or more) readable than strlen(foo)?
> 
> DROP IT.  OpenBSD and NetBSD uses ``char *foo = "bar";''
> We use ``char foo[] = bar";'' due to Mark's pickier lint.  I am not going
> to change that line of our code.  BUT the other BSD's cannot use `sizeof'
> because that will be 4 or 8, which is much less than the ?17? that
> `sizeof' would be for us.  Thus have to use strlen(), and thus we WILL
> use strlen().
> 
> Go buy yourself a gigahertz Athlon (Duron if you're cheap) and find
> something REAL to worry about.
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message

. . . besides which, won't (or shouldn't) the builtin strlen() optimize
to a constant for lengths determinable at compile time and proven to be
static constants?  This would seem to be a simple, no-brainer,
optimization for the the builtin strlen().
-- 
         _
  | |V| / '                       ||  MacroHard --                   \
\_| | | \_,                       ||     the perfection of form over |
----------------------------------||     substance, marketing over   |
Web:  http://www.borgsdemons.com  ||     performance, and greed over |
AIM:  johnmcooper                 ||     design . . .                |
=====================================================================/
Public Key:  http://www.borgsdemons.com/Personal/pgpkey.asc          |
=====================================================================\


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1018030764.4511.22.camel>