Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 05:50:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/28731: inconsistent use of <command> and <literal> in committers-guide article for cvs commands Message-ID: <200107061250.f66Co3P12371@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/28731; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/28731: inconsistent use of <command> and <literal> in committers-guide article for cvs commands Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 05:41:35 -0700 Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> writes: > >Fix: > > We should probably change all the cvs subcommands to <literal>'s or to > <command>'s. But have them all use the same tag, instead of both. I think they should be <command>, not <literal>. mdoc(7) has an .Ic, interactive command, macro for these things, but DocBook has no equivilent. <command> sounds better than <literal>. Would you be willing to submit a patch? :-) Thanks, Dima Dorfman dima@unixfreak.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200107061250.f66Co3P12371>